Medpedia

Comments

To add a comment to the original post, click here.

• (Comment from original source - Maria) on Sep 01, 10 08:00AM
  Thank you again for being a voice of reason in this debate, Stuart! I greatly appreciate your input in helping us keep a rational perspective on CSSVI. Take care!
• (Comment from original source - Sharon) on Sep 01, 10 11:19AM
  Stu, I think you hit the nail on the head. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and your rational thinking.
• (Comment from original source - Anonymous) on Sep 02, 10 04:32AM
  Stuart - once again you are the voice of reason in this most confusing world of ours. Just like everything else, there is no one size fits all or even fits most! Thank you for clarifying (hopefully) for some that CCSVI is not a quick and easy fix for all. I'm not ruling it out, just want more data. For me it is the "why" and "why not" I am seeking.
• (Comment from original source - Anonymous) on Sep 02, 10 08:00AM
  The Buffalo studies should tell us alot. I hope you will post the results as they become available. I had the procedure done exactly 2 weeks ago(in the USA) and I can tell you my mental fog and fatigue are much better if not completely gone. My double vision is still there but also much better. I just feel normal again. My walking has not improved but I am hopeful that I will see signs in the upcoming months. That's all I can ask for after 25 years of this mess.
• (Comment from original source - Stuart) on Sep 02, 10 09:23AM
  re: Buffalo Studies --
  If the information is sent to me, then I can publish
  Regards,
  Stuart
• (Comment from original source - Stuart) on Sep 02, 10 09:23AM
  re: Buffalo Studies --
  If the information is sent to me, then I can publish
  Regards,
  Stuart