Medpedia

Jan 27, 12 06:40AM | 0 comments

A study published online in the American Journal of Public Health fiddled around with red (avoid) and green (eat me) labels on items in a hospital cafeteria.

The investigators measured sales before the start of the intervention.  About a quarter of items sold were in the red category and 42% were green—these hospital workers were already making healthy choices.

The intervention took place in two 3-month phases.  The first phase just involved traffic light labels.  In the second phase, the investigators moved the items around to make the green-labeled products more visible and accessible.

The results: labels alone led to decreases in sales of red-labeled items and increases in sales of those with green labels.

For example, sales of red-labeled drinks decreased by 16.5%.  When the drinks were made less accessible, sales declined by an additional 11.4% (sales of bottled water increased).

No wonder the food industry in Great Britain fought so hard against traffic light front-of-package labeling.  No wonder the Grocery Manufacturers Association and Food Marketing Institute much prefer their own guaranteed-not-to-work system.

And data like these surely explain why the FDA is taking so long to do anything with the Institute of Medicine’s proposed labeling system—not exactly traffic lights, but pretty close.

This study provides further evidence for the value of such schemes for helping people make healthier choices.

FDA: get busy!

Comments

To add a comment to the original post, click here.

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Sign in now
  • (Comment from original source - James Howell) on Jan 27, 12 09:32AM

    Yeah but who decides which food is “red” and which is “green?” A bunch of bureaucrats?

    I don’t have access to the PDF but did they label meat and saturated fat as “bad?” Do they recommend, I wonder, high-carb whole grains? Based upon their places of work, I’m willing to bet they do.

  • (Comment from original source - Adrienne) on Jan 27, 12 09:47AM

    A few years ago, there was a program for teaching kids about “Go, Slow and Whoa” foods, corresponding to Green/Yellow/Red. It’s a powerful representation.

    One mobile phone food diary/coaching tool uses this approach: Noom (the coaching tool which combines food & physical activity) and Calorific (the food diary part). Rather than keeping track of each individual food you eat, you keep track of how many Green/Yellow/Red foods you eat.

  • (Comment from original source - justthefacts) on Jan 27, 12 10:30AM

    @ James Howell

    EXPERTS in science and public health decide which food is red or green, that’s who. Sadly, many of them are employed by bureaucracies that get bogged down by politics that is guided by ideology rather than science.

  • (Comment from original source - justthefacts) on Jan 27, 12 10:51AM

    See Marion’s post for Aug 16, 2011

    “The Fuss Over Saturated Fat”

    Note especially the comments at the end of the column.

  • (Comment from original source - Post 2 – Part 2 – Traffic Lights « catetemple) on Jan 27, 12 02:16PM

    [...] recently read an article about a study done to help people make healthier eating choices. The experiment was simple: red [...]

  • (Comment from original source - L’étiquetage par des feux tricolores, ça marche ! - Un article de Le Blog d’Albert Amgar) on Jan 27, 12 02:41PM

    [...] quoi : l’étiquetage par des feux tricolores, ça marche (Guess what: Traffic light labels work) est un article de Marion Nestle paru le 27 janvier sur son blog Food [...]

  • (Comment from original source - Cathy Richards) on Jan 27, 12 02:57PM

    Yes, the system really did work in Britain. I visit often and was quite impressed by it. Also, in 2006 they did a great presentation at a food policy conference in Ottawa. Here is the link to the presentation:
    http://www.cspinet.org/canada/2008conference/presentation/Hignett2_FoodLabellingPanel.pdf

  • (Comment from original source - Melanie) on Jan 28, 12 08:38AM

    OK, so a ‘red light’ label is stuck to my favorite foods by some cryptic cult of know-it-all “experts”. But who are they, really? What are their scientific credentials? Why do I care what they think I should or shouldn’t enjoy eating? What business is that of theirs? Too bad for you, I recognize meddling busybodies when I encounter them. I wouldn’t waste my time glancing at your asinine labels. Right into the recycling, that’s the outcome for your silly alarmist stickers.

  • (Comment from original source - Wishful Thinking « necridx5) on Jan 28, 12 08:30PM

    [...] read the article Guess What Traffic Light Labels Work posted on foodpolitics.com and it got me thinking.  A green label means a healthy food and a red [...]

  • (Comment from original source - Red Light, Green Light) on Jan 31, 12 09:28PM

    [...] Marion Nestle reports on a study testing the efficacy of a simple “traffic light” syst… A study published online in the American Journal of Public Health fiddled around with red (avoid) and green (eat me) labels on items in a hospital cafeteria. [...]

  • (Comment from original source - zulqurnain warraich) on Feb 07, 12 04:01AM

    A competent doctor for eyes treatment to give beautiful look to your personality and have ability to solve all the problems with help of best prosthetic eye techniques to restore the loss of your natural appearance at economical rates.

Editor Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Professional Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cancel