An interesting article in Forbes (NHS readers be aware – IE6 hates Forbes) describing UpToDate as “Medicine’s Killer App”. It identifies some of the reasons that clinicians are so fond of what is essentially a textbook and adds an interesting perspective on some of the previous discussion around this product.
The UpToDate article is one of a series of four with the most interesting article for me being about Standards and practice. This is well worth a read for considering how guidance may and may not be adopted and when considering the Quality standards under development at NICE.
Comments
To add a comment to the original post, click here.
You must be signed in to post a comment.
Sign in nowRSS overload is a big problem for me, the problem is when you mark as read you forget which blogs you just always skip over, those need weeding really.
I know Google Reader tracks the things you have read (what doesn’t google track?) but I am not sure if it differentiates between actually read and just clicked bulk read. Must have a look.
I think the professional is personal too and I find it difficult to write in a strictly ‘professional’ style – I always veer into the personal – can’t help it. . . .
Despite the universal loathing for email and the wonderful world that RSS was supposed to deliver, I can’t help but feel that RSS has simply failed to live up to its promise. It’s just too easy to ignore. Emails sit in my inbox, staring me down every day until I do something with them. RSS feeds on the other hand can be wiped clean without a shred of remorse. Despite subscribing to numerous work-related feeds over the years, I only have two that get read more than 50% of the time. This one and Bad Science. Perhaps cpd23 will help me find something else that sticks.
Thanks Ben – pleased to be offering something generally worth reading.
I am finding it hard to know where to turn in the torrent of potential reading – I have enjoyed more than a few things I have read but I wonder if future posts without the CPD23 motivation would necessarily remain a priority? Hopefully some good new stuff will bubble up as you say.
Interesting post. I think you’re right that having the group blog is a little confusing (IMO partly because the title of it implies a single author). Maybe if the blog had a little avatar next to each post representing the author, that might make it clearer?
Also agree that keeping personal and professional totally separate is near-impossible.
I have a near-unique forename/surname combo; feel it might be a blessing for branding but a curse for any semblence of privacy/anonymity…
Good point on the avatar thing – I suspect a previous blog template did include this information but at the cost of the post titles showing. No doubt we will change it again in the future.
The title reflects the fact that I think this blog started as one person affair and slowly borged into the present arrangement.
I note from your blog that you are a London based CPD23er – I hope you will take advantage of the event in week 5 (advertised elsewhere on this blog!)
[...] is not a new thing for me. I had a long love affair with Bloglines that I used for a good six years and I have commented already about my current RSS [...]
[...] thing for me. I had a long love affair with Bloglines that I used for a good six years and I have commented already about my current RSS [...]
I haven’t heard of Pushnote but it must have had some decent hype to have you fight to get it working. I’ve been using StumbleUpon sporadically over the last couple of years but I suppose this is more for transferable bookmarks & tags than assigning a rating to things.
I use something called Yoono that embeds in Firefox for Twitter access. It recently had access issues possibly because I use it across home and work but these seemed to resolve when I upgraded. It seems quite good and I’ve tried some of the ‘flash in the pan’ ones.
You have to fight to get rid of it too!
Your post made me smile. I am one of those who have worked in medical education and know the term ‘reflective practice’ and find that it’s almost easier to do it than to explain it!
I’m interested in your hope that CILIP will introduce mandatory CPD; with my Devil’s Advocate hat on for a minute, would you be concerned that in an attempt to ‘professionalise the profession’, it would discourage people from Chartership/CPD altogether?
For me the need is to make Chartership enduringly meaningful both to those in the profession and our employers. Chartership at present is a useful process but a one shot deal. I know you can revalidate but without the push will people do it? Signs point to only a limited level of uptake.
People are doing the CPD anyway – stacks of it. The mandatory element would be the tracking. As a pay off for the small effort of online tracking (beyond the personal value of actually doing the reflection) there should be a public online site that I could point to that would allow employers to verify that I was maintaining my Chartered status. As a recruiter I would value this.
Hi,
I get much more out of the CILIP discussions on LinkedIn than I ever did with CILIP Communities. People just seem to use it more often so it becomes much more dynamic. It’s quite nice to be able to check someone’s profile when they have commented on something too – just to check that they may know what they are talking about! Sarah
RT@ LibrarianGMIT: New useful search engine that returns full PDF scientific articles not subject to access fees: http://www.freefullpdf.com
*Headdesk*
*eye roll*