Medpedia

Jan 19, 12 03:53PM | 0 comments

Vitamin D is a nutrient (well, technically a hormone) that has had a substantial amount of research devoted to it over recent years. As someone who enjoys keeping up with the latest findings, I am often dismayed at the outdated — and often inaccurate– information shared with the public.

Below, three crucial, but little-known, vitamin D facts everyone must know for the sake of their health.

1. Current Vitamin D Recommendations Are Too Low

When I suggest to a client that they supplement 4,000 to 6,000 International Units (IUs) of vitamin D a day, their first reaction is usually one of two: “But I already take a multivitamin” or “Wow! That sounds like a lot”.

It does sound extreme when you consider that the current recommended daily intake is set at 600 IUs for anyone between the ages of 14 and 70 (this was increased a little over a year ago from the former recommendation of 400 IUs). Your average multivitamin provides anywhere from 400 to 600 IUs.

The problem is that the 600 IUs recommendation is based on research that solely examined vitamin D’s role in bone health. While that is certainly one function of vitamin D, there are many more (almost every cell in the human body has vitamin D receptors). Newer research has implicated D in blood glucose control, mood disorders, and heart health.

Besides, when we make vitamin D from the sun, we can make up to 10,000 International Units a day under optimal conditions (certainly calls into question some recommendations which set an Upper Tolerable Limit of 2,000 IUs). And, while anecdotal, the only way I have seen deficiencies corrected — in both clinical and outpatient settings — was with supplementation of anywhere from 4,000 to 10,000 International Units a day (depending on the severity of the deficiency).

2) You Don’t Make Vitamin D From the Sun Year-Round

Many individuals who learn they are vitamin D deficient are often surprised since “they are always out in the sun”.  Depending where you live, though, your ability to make vitamin D is inhibited for many months.

There isn’t full agreement in the health field, but the most common belief is that if you live north of the 35th parallel (see map here), your body is unable to make vitamin D from the sun for several months (roughly from November to April). For what it’s worth, some people abide by the “33rd parallel” theory, while others think “the 37th parallel” is more accurate.

The point is — if you’re north of Los Angeles, you are not making vitamin D for many months, even if you are out in the sun, at noon, wearing next to nothing. The reason? The sun’s UVB rays — the ones responsible for vitamin D production — don’t reach you.

3) There Are A Lot of Barriers to Vitamin D Production

Let’s say you live in an area where you can make vitamin D year-round. Or that you’re all the way up in Boston, but it’s the middle of July, so the UVB rays are on and poppin’. You are getting all your vitamin D from the sun, right?  Not quite. There are many barriers that can inhibit vitamin D production:

In summary: 600 IUs of vitamin D a day won’t cut it. You owe it to yourself to have proper levels, and, to do so, you can’t depend on sunlight or the paltry amounts fortified in food.

Share

Comments

To add a comment to the original post, click here.

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Sign in now
  • (Comment from original source - Paulette) on Jan 19, 12 04:12PM

    Nice tidy, clear article about Vitamin D realities. Definitely in line with my other readings about recent vitamin D findings. makes me feel better about my D intake (>1000, <2000) as not being too high, , but makes me consider higher levels especially in winter. Since I'm in Canada, I don't worry about 34th or 37th… Both WAY south of me.

  • (Comment from original source - Brandon) on Jan 19, 12 04:53PM

    Good article, but can you change the “we make 10000 IUs” statement to something like “we CAN make UP TO 10000 IUs” or “STORE UP TO” or something similar. Its a little misleading and made me do a triple take and read the paper, which says full body exposure to UV rays for X amount of time (that I didn’t see). I don’t go run outside naked, or go to tanning booths.

    Thanks.

  • (Comment from original source - Andy Bellatti) on Jan 19, 12 05:06PM

    Brandon,

    It’s not about running outside naked. It can mean something as simple as sunbathing for 30 – 60 minutes during optimal exposure times. I’ll reword that sentence so it is more clear.

  • (Comment from original source - Shereen) on Jan 19, 12 05:26PM

    I have always been a bit conflicted about supplements. It seems more logical to me that eating a diet consisting of a variety of whole foods should provide all the nutrition that we need. Otherwise, how did the species survive for so long before the invention of supplements?

  • (Comment from original source - Andy Bellatti) on Jan 19, 12 05:30PM

    Shereen,

    Vitamin D is not plentiful in the food supply. The popular vitamin D beverage — milk — only contains it because of fortification (it does not occur naturally).

    As for the survival of our species: low levels of vitamin D do not cause death. They increase the risk of certain diseases and can speed up/worsen conditions like osteoporosis, but most people you know today spend decades living with some degree of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency.

    Also, certain factors that inhibit vitamin D production, like air pollution and SPF, were not an issue hundreds of years ago.

  • (Comment from original source - Felix) on Jan 20, 12 04:34AM

    For some reason I can’t seem to find vitamin D supplements without Calcium in them.. Since it appears that Ca supplements are potentially problematic, I’d like to avoid taking it.

  • (Comment from original source - Andy Bellatti) on Jan 20, 12 10:27AM

    Felix,

    That’s interesting; I assume you don’t live in the US (not only based on your comment, but also on your e-mail address)? There are no stores that sell plain vitamin D?

  • (Comment from original source - Alex) on Jan 20, 12 09:24PM

    Other than vitamin D, is there anything specifically you think most people should supplement?

  • (Comment from original source - Andy Bellatti) on Jan 20, 12 09:55PM

    I recommend B12 supplements to vegetarians and vegans. I also think most people should supplement probiotics (unless they eat fermented foods regularly, which I don’t find to be very common) and DHA and EPA Omega 3s.

  • (Comment from original source - Staci) on Jan 21, 12 04:53PM

    Is there a major difference between supplementing with Vitamin D2 vs. D3?

  • (Comment from original source - Felix) on Jan 23, 12 01:54PM

    Hey Andy, in the stores I frequent, no. It’s always together with either Ca or Ca+Mg. I discovered that I can order plain Vitamin D from Amazon though..

  • (Comment from original source - Irene) on Jan 23, 12 08:35PM

    How many IU/day would you recommend for children?

  • (Comment from original source - Get Dem Apples » Three Nice Things To Know About Vitamin D » Get Dem Apples) on Feb 03, 12 11:19AM

    [...] Check out Small Bites for more detail. [...]

Editor Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Professional Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cancel