answered Aug 18, 2010 at 08:11AM
I can see from your points, Maurice, that there are pluses and minuses to being a "physician patient". I am glad you mentioned the multiple awakenings necessary for care and recovery, that might be waived for VIPs but which are necessary to assess patient status and administer drugs. While appearing deferential, waiving this activity could put the physician's health at risk. Another issue is how frank physicians wish to be about co-morbidities or corollary issues to a medical concern that may not be properly addressed or even probed by other medical staff, to respect the privacy or status of the physician. Such issues as addictions or substance mis-use, suicidal ideation or plan, domestic violence, or unethical conduct, which may or may not be related to the primary medical presentation and addressed as such. Physicians are human, and while rightfully valued and respected for the ability to heal and save lives, they have the same strengths and weaknesses as everyone else. I knew someone who worked in an emergency room of an American hospital for two years, who enlightened me to this fact. As for the hospital gaining from according a physician patient VIP treatment because he or she brings in the bucks for the institution, perhaps that is an ethical issue but one that is understandable. Physicians are assets as well as healers, and the fact is, we live in a materialistic world that assesses human beings for moneymaking potential. But for me, that diminishes the physician as a healer, which is how most like to view themselves. You are not cynical, Maurice, just realistic and wise.