Medpedia

The content on or accessible through Medpedia.com is for informational purposes only. Medpedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified health professional. Read more

Medpedia Answers

(Other)

Medpedia Answers is a platform for asking and answering questions about health and medicine. Read more.

If the parents of a child refuse to have their child vaccinated, what should the pediatrician or family physician do next?

There may be many reasons for parents to refuse a physician's advice to have their child vaccinated for significant diseases which can be acquired in childhood or later. But what is the pediatrician or family physician to do next after the refusal. Certainly the doctor should, after explaining the benefit of vaccination to the child but also the benefit to the community and any realistic risks involved, ask questions to the family about what they understood as the value and risks and then why they are continuing to refuse vaccination. But what if the refusal is not based on some personal financial or some medical or scientifically proven contra-indication but on a religious or some personal idiosyncrasy? Should the physician then discharge the patient from further care and tell the parents to find another physician? Should the physician report the parents to the appropriate governmental child protective agency or the health department? Or is it professional and ethical for the physician simply to accept the refusal as a parental right and continue caring for the child?
If you were the pediatrician.. what would you do? ..Maurice.
asked Apr 22, 2011 at 01:09PM in Other
4 Answers
4 Following
↓ answer this question
Sort By Date Votes
  • 0
    Votes
    answered May 01, 2011 at 05:13PM
    Maurice, you little pot stirrer, you!!! :)

    I personally feel it is quite concerning when doctors discharge patients who choose not to use vaccination.

    First, some physicians recommend these patients only be seen at the end of the day, where spreading of any infectious agent can be kept to a minimum. This is often a solution to address the infectivity of their other patients.

    Patient education is important. In addition, physicians should be proactive about questioning pharma companies re: the need for these multiple vaccinations, their ingredients, etc. I feel this whole vaccination debacle could have been avoided if physicians had been more inquisitive about newly introduced vaccinations and their ingredients from the beginning. In their well understood desire to combat disease, it is possible that physicians became too enamored of any vaccination and have lost the inquisitiveness which most physicians normally have. Doctors could have taken the lead on this discussion and alleviated any valid concerns, totally obviating this current stand off with some patients.

    I don't feel the effect on our immune systems from these vaccinations has been fully investigated. Most experts in the vaccination field say these are perfectly safe and are no different from the daily contact with germs that every person normally gets, only WE decide which germs they are in contact with rather than a random event. There is, however, a tremendous epidemic of autoimmune diseases happening which gets very little press. Of course, this could be caused from environmental contaminants or toxins, changes in the way we live, foods, or a multitude of other things. But the massive increase in mandatory vaccinations also affects the immune system. For instance, type 1 diabetes, which is an autoimmune problem, is skyrocketing. The rates of this disease have gone up 3% PER YEAR. This is a health emergency which gets very little public attention. This is only one of thousands of diseases and symptoms affected by this autoimmune epidemic. I am not trying to implicate vaccines, but feel strongly that these questions have not been fully answered. Answering, or at least beginning the investigation on these issues would go a long way in calming the public's concern. This is a science AND a PR issue.

    Also, some doctors offer an elongated schedule for vaccination which minimize the number of vaccines given at any one time, which often can allay the fears of the parents. I think this approach is very reasonable and an easy way to accommodate parental concerns.

    OK, blast away!!!!!!
  • 0
    Votes
    answered May 01, 2011 at 05:22PM
    Pediatricians are becoming more savvy to the dangers of chemicals in our environment. It is possible this vaccination issue has brought these related issues to the attention of enough doctors that something will finally be done. Pediatricians have called for better regulation of toxins that children (and their families) may come in contact with during the average day. It is a beginning. Thanks to all the parents who nagged, cajoled and educated their doctors. This doesn't mean don't vaccinate. Just additional information that may help us move this country and our children in a healthier direction!!

    Here is a story on the Pediatrics/toxin issue

    http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/medical/pediatrics/story/2011/04/Pediatricians-seek-better-regulation-of-toxins/46474962/1

    Here is an essay on environmental toxins.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristin-wartman/food-additives_b_853751.html

    Quote: "The current law is so weak that the Environmental Protection Agency wasn't even able to use it to ban asbestos"

    Again, blast away!!!
  • 0
    Votes
    answered May 05, 2011 at 04:28PM
    I am new to this site and I am not a doctor, but I am a parent of 2 children, and as you can imagine, this conversation has come up a lot, and in different ways.

    Broadly speaking, I think anytime a doctor becomes confrontational with a patient, he or she runs the risk of alienating the patient, with unwanted results. On the other hand, I believe that doctors certainly have the right to offer care in a manner that they see fit and be honest and up front with their patients. Obviously honesty and open communication are essential to the doctor/patient relationship. I'll give a few examples.

    When my son was born the number, type and schedule of vaccines seemed ridiculous to me. When I first discussed this with our new pediatrician, he sort of rolled his eyes and asked, "has Mothering Magazine come out with another article?" (Mothering, as you are probably aware, is a very, very progressive parenting mag that embraces "natural" family lifestyles).

    But he then went on to discuss my concerns, took time to listen, provided me with literature to read, and said that the choice was mine to make even if he didn't agree. In the end I did agree to most of the vaccinations except for Hep B (until he went to preschool at 3). We also slowed down the schedule, so that he would never receive more than 2 at a time.

    When my daughter was born 5 years later we really liked the attending pediatrician at the hospital so we decided to make her first appointment with him. I still had reservations about Hep B (which I believed to be unnecessary, especially since she wouldn't be attending daycare), and the rigorous schedule. He said, very respectfully and kindly, that he insisted that all of the children in his practice receive the standard vaccinations. If I was not comfortable with this, he said, then he was probably not the right pediatrician for our family. It was very amicable, and I appreciated his up front honesty. His practice, his rules. We took our daughter to our son's pediatrician whom they both see today.

    Parents and doctors don't always agree. Moreover, parents' abilities to educate themselves about vaccines and any other medical issue must create a challenging environment for doctors at times, especially when the internet is rife with both information and disinformation. Nevertheless, is crucial for parents to feel respected and listened to instead of being told, "this is how you must do it, or else". This is true of the vaccines debate, what if a more serious, imminent situation presents? I recently finished a documentary about parents who didn't want to treat their HIV+ kids with medications after doing their own research on side effects. What I found quite frequently was that parents who felt that their concerns were being taken seriously were far more likely to trust and listen to their doctors than those that felt they were being bullied - many of whom dropped right out of the system altogether. Nobody wants that.

    Thanks for reading,

    Jennifer Wolfe
    http://this-child-of-mine.blogspot.com/
  • 0
    Votes
    answered May 05, 2011 at 05:18PM
    That was a most loving and thoughtful presentation of the issue and probably encompasses the feelings of 90% of parents. Proper communication often leads to the best health results. Thanks for posting.
The content on or accessible through Medpedia.com is for informational purposes only. Medpedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified health professional. Read more
Editor Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Professional Directory - browse by last initial
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cancel