I read an article yesterday that claimed high-fructose corn syrup is no worse for you than regular sugar. They claim that the nutritional value is the same, and that all the controversy over "high-fructose corn syrup" is simply hype.
Perhaps I've been brainwashed by Michael Pollan and the like, but I was under the impression that high-fructose corn syrup is to be avoided. The way I see it, because it's a man-made combination, the long term implications on our health are still unknown. The word "high-fructose corn syrup" sounds artificial to me -- although it seems that there are very few things that we eat that have not been "altered" by man.
The most important line of the article seems to be the following: "...there is a question whether our bodies metabolize high-fructose corn syrup differently than table sugar. Scientists at UC Davis are conducting a long-term study to answer that."
http://wap.cbsnews.com/site?t=Ev3y31ED29IDNj6E4XPOZg&sid=cbsnews
Does anyone have any thoughts on this topic? Has anyone done research in this field?